The link below is to a column recently published in The Oregonian about the practical effects of a change in the name of a geographic landmark. It takes on particular interest in the wake of our recent class readings, "You Are What You Say" and "Sexism in English," and our subsequent class discussions.
"Word rarely used -- good advice for all"
Questions to ponder:
Midway thru the column, Parker writes, "I guess it's understandable how people get attached to names," but he doesn't explain any further. Why do you think people get attached to names, and what does it say about the relationship between language and the world?
Parker's comments about both Mt. Hood and Squaw Mountain Road raise the question -- What gives a name significance? For a personal perspective on the question, consider: what is your response to his suggestion for re-naming Mt. Hood? Why do you feel that way? Before reading this column, did you know what the significance of Mt. Hood's name was? Did, or does, that matter?
What decision should the Clackamas County commissioners make about Squaw Mountain Road? Why? What does your answer say about your view of the relationship between language and the world? Why do you hold that view?
Showing posts with label names. Show all posts
Showing posts with label names. Show all posts
Sunday, May 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)